Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 19(2): 206-216, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1482622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rates as well as the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes in patients with known active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding CIED procedures during active COVID-19, performed with personal protective equipment, based on an international survey. METHODS: Fifty-three centers from 13 countries across 4 continents provided information on 166 patients with known active COVID-19 who underwent a CIED procedure. RESULTS: The CIED procedure rate in 133,655 hospitalized COVID-19 patients ranged from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 patients (P <.001). Most devices were implanted due to high-degree/complete atrioventricular block (112 [67.5%]) or sick sinus syndrome (31 [18.7%]). Of the 166 patients in the study survey, the 30-day complication rate was 13.9% and the 180-day mortality rate was 9.6%. One patient had a fatal outcome as a direct result of the procedure. Differences in patient and procedural characteristics and outcomes were found between Europe and North America. An older population (76.6 vs 66 years; P <.001) with a nonsignificant higher complication rate (16.5% vs 7.7%; P = .2) was observed in Europe vs North America, whereas higher rates of critically ill patients (33.3% vs 3.3%; P <.001) and mortality (26.9% vs 5%; P = .002) were observed in North America vs Europe. CONCLUSION: CIED procedure rates during known active COVID-19 disease varied greatly, from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients worldwide. Patients with active COVID-19 infection who underwent CIED implantation had high complication and mortality rates. Operators should take these risks into consideration before proceeding with CIED implantation in active COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , COVID-19 , Control de Infecciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Implantación de Prótesis , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo , Anciano , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/epidemiología , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/terapia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Comorbilidad , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/instrumentación , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/epidemiología , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(8): 2081-2094, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1336718

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To rapidly exclude severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using artificial intelligence applied to the electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: A global, volunteer consortium from 4 continents identified patients with ECGs obtained around the time of polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and age- and sex-matched controls from the same sites. Clinical characteristics, polymerase chain reaction results, and raw electrocardiographic data were collected. A convolutional neural network was trained using 26,153 ECGs (33.2% COVID positive), validated with 3826 ECGs (33.3% positive), and tested on 7870 ECGs not included in other sets (32.7% positive). Performance under different prevalence values was tested by adding control ECGs from a single high-volume site. RESULTS: The area under the curve for detection of acute COVID-19 infection in the test group was 0.767 (95% CI, 0.756 to 0.778; sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 10%; positive predictive value, 37%; negative predictive value, 91%). To more accurately reflect a real-world population, 50,905 normal controls were added to adjust the COVID prevalence to approximately 5% (2657/58,555), resulting in an area under the curve of 0.780 (95% CI, 0.771 to 0.790) with a specificity of 12.1% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. CONCLUSION: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 results in electrocardiographic changes that permit the artificial intelligence-enhanced ECG to be used as a rapid screening test with a high negative predictive value (99.2%). This may permit the development of electrocardiography-based tools to rapidly screen individuals for pandemic control.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA